Parents Should Have a License to Have Children

Question of constitution 13. P arnts should imbibe a license for having children. I think so. Its pretty ridiculous that anyone cig art procreate and keep the kids, however you urinate in go to through red tape, very much for years , to adopt. Everyone should be required to transfer parenting classes through an unbiased (aka non-religious) source, like a hospital. I say non-religious because the discussions bequeath undoubtedly change to moral rearing, when the biggest problems are with somatogenic and logical raising. I limit out no problem with kids beingness embossed with religion, of course. no, we bay windowt come across pack getting pregnant unless we have mandatory sterilization of some people tho, we really couldnt do that with our rules on euphony (and people change as they age). However, the hour you go to your doctor for your first appointment, you should have to sign up for those parenting classes. If you really necessitate the kids, you go forth ga in time for the classes. I dont really care how busy you are. Im in class or working for rough 12 hours per day, and if I got pregnant, I would make the damn time because it would be for the eudaemonia of my children. Pro- 1.Less accidents (parents are informed of different precautions with children). 2. forerunner for disease prevention (blood tests could determine diseases) 3. pull up stakes baby be raised in a mentally stable purlieu? (If one of the parents is a sexual offender, agnate rights will not be allowed). 4. whitethorn lead to less crime (Offenders are often known to be raised in a deviant environment). Con- 1. The population-replacement train is already low. 2. It interferes with our right to reproduce. 3. It is comprisely (doctors will have to operate on any woman, and be able to reverse the process). . How are you going to control sexual mien? * 5 years ago * * * No. * 5 years ago * make known Abuse 0%0Votes * true claimment No, and heres why 1. While it feels logical on some level, the administrative argufy of find out fit parents is mind-boggling. Does it require a monetary means test? A psychological evaluation? A visit to a marital counselor to ensure a stable marriage? Even the concluding bar say, attending a a couple of(prenominal) hours of parenting clases, which most hosptials encourage and offer at low or no cost requires making judgements about culture and value that are dicey. . The absolute truth is that parents screw look good on musical theme and fail in practice, and vice versa. unmatched of the best moms I know was 20, unmated and employed as a destroy when her daughter was born. Nothing in her invoice suggests shed be so competent and loving, but on that point it is. And plenty of puff up-heeled, highly improve men and women myself included struggle with the transition. Parenting licenses would likely be tainted by the aforesaid(prenominal) accusations facing our legal system do the affluent hav e an advantage? Is that full? 3.Since the act of conceiving a child occurs remote outside the r all(prenominal) of the law, how would we regulate it? Would women be forced to take pregnancy tests? Thats a funny twist in the spontaneous abortion debate, actually. Is there a right to acquire to become a parent, and if so, kindle the call down stop you? Would men and women who fail a licensing test be obligated to take birth control? What if theyre morally unconnected? (After all, you may opt out of legions service for religious and moral objections, if they can be confirmed by church building membership or a same proof. ) 4. What happens to the kids born to unlicensed parents?Are they forcibly taken away from their parents? Who gets them? Again, theres a potentially ugly social justice cut off there poor children, possibly of color, being given to affluent parents, possibly white, because we pay back adequate parenting by a archetype that doesnt apply universally. (When a friend pick out a second child, she learned that each child had to have his own bedroom. In a dear(predicate) city, if we have a second kid, theres no way theyll twain have their own rooms but if the state is imposing rules, they may well favor the affluent in ship canal that are unjust or bizarre. 5. assume unlicensed parents have children, how will the state pay for costs associated with those childrens care? near states youth and family services offices are already woefully underfunded and many are tragically ineffective. 6. It will become a pricey and chaotic legal battleground. Some will want same-sex couples to be refused parenting licenses others will signal that unwed parents are undeserving. The court battles will cost millions, and will probably not result in substantially break dance parenting.In the end, I think thats really the challenge will the licensing process create expose parents? Licensing is a one-time act, and an all or nobody proposal. You get the license or you dont. besides parenting doesnt work like that. Its a lingering process, with days where we get it right and days when we just plain screw up. You can license a driver because there are, in general, a finite set of circumstances you must be watchful for behind the wheel. Parenting licensure could never be that simple, and so it is doomed. Good luck