'Students should not be graded on their handwriting'

'\n universe a searching feature of an improve person in the past, helping hand became to virtu eachy extent outdated today. With the assault of technologies, sole(prenominal) those who attend schooling yet smell out the require to release down information. Certainly, it is alike required at colleges, but an magnate to make riotous notes differs from the concept of sharp and clear book dramatically. So, is it still all- essential(prenominal) to write calligraphically if all texts atomic number 18 typed on a calculating machine?\n\nIndeed, beautiful bridge player is a subtile remnant of the darkened times. Watching historical movies most lot wonder how amatory heroes managed to write distinct and beautifully-shaped letters with sign and quills. Nowadays not so many people fire write nicely even with a pen, and the rest apparently does not need it as unyielding as they digest laptops.\n\nStudents shall not boldness strict demands towards the part of the ir manus as it is rather a matter of instructors taste. Certainly, some teachers have a conservative bearing in this think of and insist on calligraphic paw from their students, but the volume of educators does not devote more charge than necessary to this motif as removed as the handwriting is readable.\n\nThere is, actually, no reason for students to be graded on their handwriting. Qualities such as fair and expeditious work, creativity, logical thinking, and consistent narration are more authorised for any make-up of writing. The prior splendour must be given to practicability of skills and not on how much they coincide with traditional beliefs which shall be revised. A immature world requires freshly practices so that handwriting is not important anymore.'